ASICS Men's Jolt 2 Running Shoes

Product Information

I was pleased to see that the Jolt was made entirely of Carbon. I'm not interested in racing, just as a very fast sport model and happily accept that its a little heavier than my Viper. Thus the '@' wildcard is the mean "copy the value of the data at this level in the tree, to the output".

However, the Jolt 2 is effective in meeting needs. It has no tragic deficit that makes me say NO to running in them. At this price point, it is pretty in line with other makes and models in the same expense range. Take your time with the Jolt 2 On the LHS of the spec, # allows you to specify a hard coded String to be place as a value in the output.Correct me if I'm wrong, but: Wow, currently to my knowledge a single .java file on GitHub, last commit in 2017, holds relevant parts of the official documentation of the JOLT syntax. I had to use its syntax since I'm working with NiFi and applied its JoltTransformJSON processor (hence the SEO abuses in my question, so more people find the answer) The way to think of it, is that it allows you to specify a "synthentic" value, aka a value not found in the input data. The Jolt 2 is a fast and substantial sport pylon racer. The surface finish is excellent and very thin high aspect ratio wing and cavernous fuselage to take a big motor and battery make this a very fast and impressive economy racer.

Feet are also kept protected thanks to reinforced synthetic overlays on the mid and front of your JOLT 2s, while the all-important cushioning is provided thanks to the EVA midsole. An internal heel counter helps give a great fit, while the solid rubber outsole and stitch down reinforcement means they're built to last.

See also

What "[#2]" means is, go up the three levels and ask that node how many matches it has had, and then use that as an index in the arrays. There are syntactic sugar versions of the wildcard, all of the following mean the same thing; Sugar : '&' = '&0' = '&(0)' = '&(0,0)

The ASICS Jolt 2 is great for the beginner runner needing to just get in 1-3 miles at a time. For a nice easy run to moderate-intensity efforts, you will feel fine in these. Not only will you be satisfied with the price to get your short efforts in, but you will also be satisfied that they will last a long time. When it comes to comfort, The ASICS Jolt 2 is way below my expectations. I like to have some "feel-good feet" when I'm running. The Jolt 2 just feels like a flexible board. It is extremely firm and does not allow you to enjoy a pleasing ride which is even more prevalent in runs over 5 miles. The initial use-case for this feature was to be able to process a Boolean input value, and if the value is boolean true write out the string "enabled". Note, this was possible before, but it required two Shiftr steps. Others have different needs though and I think the Jolt 2 weight will be great for those larger folks needing a solid "base" and support when striding for your runs. Weight is not bad, it just depends on need. Impressive durability The fuselage tailboom and fin is a strong all carbon one piece molding. The under-wing battery compartment is a generous 13 cm x 4 cm x 4 cm. The wing is fixed by three M3 bolts with threaded hard points already installed in the fuselage. Note people usually fit the elevator servo under the rear wing hold down bolt.

When you lace up the Jolt 2 you'll immediately notice the weight and firmness which is carried over into the miles you're about to put in. I've run mostly short runs in The Jolt 2 simply because anything over 5, just feels like I am asking more of the shoe than is reasonable for it. The heft weight and the uncomfortable rigidness make me feel like I'm pounding the pavement every stride verses, just floating along. The base case operation of Shiftr is to copy input JSON "values", thus we need a way to specify that we want to copy the input JSON "key" instead. A full rubber outsole made for roads of any kind, the Jolt 2 is a very effective gripper. I never experienced any issues here. I would not say trail-capable, however. I waited ages and pestered Neil several times as to when this model was going to be available but it was worth the wait. I used to own an F5D Viper - it was a great model in the air but built and designed as a competition model it was fragile on landing - especially at the high speed that it always flew at even on the glide.